Many people are frightened right now about the prospect of the U.S. government shutting down. I say let's go for it. There is not one federal government program that is effective. The USPS is bankrupt and we are trillions of dollars in debt, mostly to China. About this point many will be saying we need our military. We need a military, but not the current one which is being led by liberals and has been since after WWII.
Our military has lost every war since WWII. We did not win in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, or Afghanistan. It is one thing to have the best troops, best equipment, and best war machinery, but if you have leaders with a liberal mindset they will lose every time.
The best thing that could happen is if this government shuts down for good and the states begin to fend for themselves as the Constitution originally dictated. All current Congressmen, Senators, and of course our lame President should leave office immediately after the government is shutdown. Never to return. Let them go play golf for the next few decades (at their expense and not the taxpayers). Dave Gaubatz
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Saturday, September 21, 2013
"The Truth about the Security of our Military Installations
By: Dave Gaubatz
20 Sept 2013
Due to the recent tragic events at the Navy Yard in DC, our nation's leaders are in knee-jerk mode. Politicians, military leaders and law enforcement personnel are trying to put a bandage on a problem that needs major surgery to cure. Once again Americans are being led down a road after a tragic event into believing our leaders are fixing the problems that resulted in 12 innocent deaths at the Navy Yard. Naïve Americans want security but instead they are being provided a false sense of security.
For 24 plus years I worked on dozens of U.S. military bases around the globe. I was an AFOSI Special Agent. My clearance (Top Secret/SCI and above) was the highest that our government gives. A major part of my job was to develop programs that would secure our bases from violence and from national security technology from being stolen.
There are literally millions of Americans and foreigners who have access to our bases and the information within. The Navy Yard murders are indeed bad, but what the government is currently doing will in no way make the bases safer. Their solutions will only make it harder for the honest and trustworthy people to do their jobs.
People want to believe our military and law enforcement can make our installations a safe place to live and work. What you aren't being told is that there is no way humanly possible to secure any location in the world if a person, person, or groups have their mind set on inflicting major violence. It is very easy for one to get onto a military installation. You don't have to be very bright or a career criminal with inside knowledge in order to breach security on a base. On most bases, to include the bases that hold many of our nuclear weapons (Kirtland AFB, NM, and Malstrom AFB, MT) you need only walk onto the base with little or no identification.
Right now the military's background checks are the main focus leaders are trying to resolve so people like Aaron Alexis are kept off our bases. This simply can't be done. There are thousands of civilians and U.S. military on our bases who live and work, but have no need for a security clearance. Do you know how many carpenters, plumbers, truck drivers, cooks, and other career fields that require no clearance? Millions and millions. Americans are being led to believe that if Alexis's security clearance had been revoked, the murders would not have happened. This is false and our senior leaders know this.
There is a big difference to having a security clearance and one having access to a government building. You do not need a clearance to enter a U.S. military base/compound. You just need someone to wave you through the gate and then you have all the access you want. I will use Kirtland AFB as my example. Remember this base holds the majority of our nuclear weapons and one would think this base would be impossible to infiltrate. I will give you five examples of how unauthorized or people with mental problems, or are dangerous criminals (to include terrorists) can enter a base such as Kirtland.
1.Active duty members, their families, government employees, and retired U.S. military employees and their families are granted access to any U.S. military installation. This is millions and millions of people, and the highest percentage of these groups have never or no longer hold security clearances. This doesn't mean they are given the keys to walk into the jail cells that hold our nuclear weapons, but they can get into almost any building to carry out murders if that is their intent. There are commissary's, base exchanges ,small and large department stores, gas stations, movie theaters, ball fields, and gymnasiums that any of the above mentioned groups can go to without any interference. It is without any doubt that of these millions of people who are provided direct access to the bases , some have criminal histories, some have mental health problems, and some just do not like America and our government. There are no checks in place to prevent millions upon millions of people from entering our bases if they have the desire to get into them. One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist.
2.Scientists from such countries as China, Iran, Saudi, are regular guests on U.S. military installations. Again using the very high technology of Kirtland AFB, NM, these foreigners are on the base daily. We share some technology with them, and they provide our scientists insight into technology they are working on. The military has little control of their movements when they are off duty, and it was not uncommon to find a Chinese scientist taking photographs of the nuclear weapons storage areas.
3.Kirtland AFB is a very large installation. It covers several miles and the largest portion of the base is not fenced in. There is a mountain behind the base that is used by hikers, ATV riders, etc.. They can walk from the mountain and blend into base activities. The same is for many military installations in America.
4.Many U.S. military bases have museums on their property. The museums are open to anyone, you just need to sign in at the main gate and informed the security specialists that they want a pass to go to the base. Once these people enter the base they often go to other locations on base. At Kirtland AFB we once had a bus of Iranians who wanted to visit the air museum which was located within a few hundred yards of our nuclear weapons storage area. The Iranians were found venturing all around the base taking pictures. When they were stopped by security forces, they simply said they had gotten lost.
5.Although it is very easy for millions upon millions to enter the military bases and government buildings without a badge or security clearance, I will give an example of how someone can get on if they want to do so clandestinely. I was a OSI Special Agent, with the highest clearances, and with my badge I had access to any facility on any U.S. military installation. I could also fly armed aboard commercial aircraft. U.S. law enforcement badges and credentials are so easy for people to make and/or buy from others. When we were in South Korea there was one shop after another with every law enforcement badge known to mankind. U.S. law enforcement would buy several of these badges and use them as their primary badge. They were identical to the real ones. The officers would keep their real badge in a safe location and use the counterfeit one. Why? Because if you lose a real badge and credentials you had to go through an intense investigation and you could lose your job if you were negligent in losing them.
In the U.S. there are hundreds of state and federal law enforcement agencies. Each have their individual badge designs. When a law enforcement officer go to the ticket counter he/she just has to fill out a basic form and show their badge. The ticket counter crew have no way of knowing every type badge used, and even if they did there are thousands of counterfeit ones scattered all around the world. A hijacker need only buy one for a couple of dollars and then board U.S. aircraft armed and loaded. American citizens may not be aware of this, but terrorists are.
The whole point of this article is to show that the incident at the Navy Yard could happen any day, any hour at one of hundreds of U.S. military installations. The day of 9-11, bases tried to tighten security and prevent unauthorized people from entering the bases. This resulted in long lines outside the gate with thousands of people and hundreds of cars sitting idle. If a person like Aaron Alexis wanted to kill innocent people he would need only go to the large crowds outside the base and kill as many people as he desired.
What concerns me more than anything are the public schools and colleges who have led the students and parents to believe they are safe.
A person with an intent to go to a school and kill children requires little knowledge of security at the school. Many schools now have security plans that include a student and teachers having to show a school ID to enter. A deranged person who desired to shoot innocent children would only need to wait near the school buses that crowd most school parking lots. Why do they need to come up with elaborate plans to enter a school when they can achieve their goal in the parking lot of buses?
America has only so much time, manpower and financial resources to devote to security. The military bases could resolve 99% of their security problems by allowing the U.S. military personnel to be armed. There is no reason they should not be. If you can put an M-16 and 9mm pistol into the hands of an 18 or 19 year old and order them to go into dangerous areas like Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no reason not to trust them to be armed in the U.S. on their bases.
The public schools should be America's focus. The children are the 'hearts' of our country and Americans. Let's protect them first and then branch out to try to stop every deranged person who has the intent to harm others. We can't stop them, but we can do an enormous amount to protect our children at school. We could start by being honest in America about the Islamic ideology. It is our number one national security threat. We need to get all Muslim Brotherhood groups off our campuses (Muslim Student Association) and stop filling our children's heads about Islam with false information with school textbooks which are Saudi funded.
"The truth is often unpopular, but it is never wrong"
By: Dave Gaubatz
20 Sept 2013
Due to the recent tragic events at the Navy Yard in DC, our nation's leaders are in knee-jerk mode. Politicians, military leaders and law enforcement personnel are trying to put a bandage on a problem that needs major surgery to cure. Once again Americans are being led down a road after a tragic event into believing our leaders are fixing the problems that resulted in 12 innocent deaths at the Navy Yard. Naïve Americans want security but instead they are being provided a false sense of security.
For 24 plus years I worked on dozens of U.S. military bases around the globe. I was an AFOSI Special Agent. My clearance (Top Secret/SCI and above) was the highest that our government gives. A major part of my job was to develop programs that would secure our bases from violence and from national security technology from being stolen.
There are literally millions of Americans and foreigners who have access to our bases and the information within. The Navy Yard murders are indeed bad, but what the government is currently doing will in no way make the bases safer. Their solutions will only make it harder for the honest and trustworthy people to do their jobs.
People want to believe our military and law enforcement can make our installations a safe place to live and work. What you aren't being told is that there is no way humanly possible to secure any location in the world if a person, person, or groups have their mind set on inflicting major violence. It is very easy for one to get onto a military installation. You don't have to be very bright or a career criminal with inside knowledge in order to breach security on a base. On most bases, to include the bases that hold many of our nuclear weapons (Kirtland AFB, NM, and Malstrom AFB, MT) you need only walk onto the base with little or no identification.
Right now the military's background checks are the main focus leaders are trying to resolve so people like Aaron Alexis are kept off our bases. This simply can't be done. There are thousands of civilians and U.S. military on our bases who live and work, but have no need for a security clearance. Do you know how many carpenters, plumbers, truck drivers, cooks, and other career fields that require no clearance? Millions and millions. Americans are being led to believe that if Alexis's security clearance had been revoked, the murders would not have happened. This is false and our senior leaders know this.
There is a big difference to having a security clearance and one having access to a government building. You do not need a clearance to enter a U.S. military base/compound. You just need someone to wave you through the gate and then you have all the access you want. I will use Kirtland AFB as my example. Remember this base holds the majority of our nuclear weapons and one would think this base would be impossible to infiltrate. I will give you five examples of how unauthorized or people with mental problems, or are dangerous criminals (to include terrorists) can enter a base such as Kirtland.
1.Active duty members, their families, government employees, and retired U.S. military employees and their families are granted access to any U.S. military installation. This is millions and millions of people, and the highest percentage of these groups have never or no longer hold security clearances. This doesn't mean they are given the keys to walk into the jail cells that hold our nuclear weapons, but they can get into almost any building to carry out murders if that is their intent. There are commissary's, base exchanges ,small and large department stores, gas stations, movie theaters, ball fields, and gymnasiums that any of the above mentioned groups can go to without any interference. It is without any doubt that of these millions of people who are provided direct access to the bases , some have criminal histories, some have mental health problems, and some just do not like America and our government. There are no checks in place to prevent millions upon millions of people from entering our bases if they have the desire to get into them. One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist.
2.Scientists from such countries as China, Iran, Saudi, are regular guests on U.S. military installations. Again using the very high technology of Kirtland AFB, NM, these foreigners are on the base daily. We share some technology with them, and they provide our scientists insight into technology they are working on. The military has little control of their movements when they are off duty, and it was not uncommon to find a Chinese scientist taking photographs of the nuclear weapons storage areas.
3.Kirtland AFB is a very large installation. It covers several miles and the largest portion of the base is not fenced in. There is a mountain behind the base that is used by hikers, ATV riders, etc.. They can walk from the mountain and blend into base activities. The same is for many military installations in America.
4.Many U.S. military bases have museums on their property. The museums are open to anyone, you just need to sign in at the main gate and informed the security specialists that they want a pass to go to the base. Once these people enter the base they often go to other locations on base. At Kirtland AFB we once had a bus of Iranians who wanted to visit the air museum which was located within a few hundred yards of our nuclear weapons storage area. The Iranians were found venturing all around the base taking pictures. When they were stopped by security forces, they simply said they had gotten lost.
5.Although it is very easy for millions upon millions to enter the military bases and government buildings without a badge or security clearance, I will give an example of how someone can get on if they want to do so clandestinely. I was a OSI Special Agent, with the highest clearances, and with my badge I had access to any facility on any U.S. military installation. I could also fly armed aboard commercial aircraft. U.S. law enforcement badges and credentials are so easy for people to make and/or buy from others. When we were in South Korea there was one shop after another with every law enforcement badge known to mankind. U.S. law enforcement would buy several of these badges and use them as their primary badge. They were identical to the real ones. The officers would keep their real badge in a safe location and use the counterfeit one. Why? Because if you lose a real badge and credentials you had to go through an intense investigation and you could lose your job if you were negligent in losing them.
In the U.S. there are hundreds of state and federal law enforcement agencies. Each have their individual badge designs. When a law enforcement officer go to the ticket counter he/she just has to fill out a basic form and show their badge. The ticket counter crew have no way of knowing every type badge used, and even if they did there are thousands of counterfeit ones scattered all around the world. A hijacker need only buy one for a couple of dollars and then board U.S. aircraft armed and loaded. American citizens may not be aware of this, but terrorists are.
The whole point of this article is to show that the incident at the Navy Yard could happen any day, any hour at one of hundreds of U.S. military installations. The day of 9-11, bases tried to tighten security and prevent unauthorized people from entering the bases. This resulted in long lines outside the gate with thousands of people and hundreds of cars sitting idle. If a person like Aaron Alexis wanted to kill innocent people he would need only go to the large crowds outside the base and kill as many people as he desired.
What concerns me more than anything are the public schools and colleges who have led the students and parents to believe they are safe.
A person with an intent to go to a school and kill children requires little knowledge of security at the school. Many schools now have security plans that include a student and teachers having to show a school ID to enter. A deranged person who desired to shoot innocent children would only need to wait near the school buses that crowd most school parking lots. Why do they need to come up with elaborate plans to enter a school when they can achieve their goal in the parking lot of buses?
America has only so much time, manpower and financial resources to devote to security. The military bases could resolve 99% of their security problems by allowing the U.S. military personnel to be armed. There is no reason they should not be. If you can put an M-16 and 9mm pistol into the hands of an 18 or 19 year old and order them to go into dangerous areas like Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no reason not to trust them to be armed in the U.S. on their bases.
The public schools should be America's focus. The children are the 'hearts' of our country and Americans. Let's protect them first and then branch out to try to stop every deranged person who has the intent to harm others. We can't stop them, but we can do an enormous amount to protect our children at school. We could start by being honest in America about the Islamic ideology. It is our number one national security threat. We need to get all Muslim Brotherhood groups off our campuses (Muslim Student Association) and stop filling our children's heads about Islam with false information with school textbooks which are Saudi funded.
"The truth is often unpopular, but it is never wrong"
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Mosques in America
There are approximately 2300 mosques/Islamic Centers in America. About 90% of these are Sunni and the remainder Shiite. 75 plus% of the mosques are distributing and/or advocating hatred and violence against Israel and America. They are teaching their children to distrust and hate America. Due to this our country will see more Ft. Hood type attacks.....and it will be much sooner than it is later.
The only way to eliminate or come very close to eliminating Islamic based terrorism in America is to shut down all of the mosques/Islamic Centers and the dozen of acronymns such as CAIR and ISNA. The mosques are used as safe houses and storage facilities for illegal activity. Dave Gaubatz
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Who Is The DC Navy Yard Killer? Was he Muslim, Christian, Jewish?
Americans want to know who Aaron Alexis was. That is a fact and every media organization knows that. The media does an outstanding job of finding out every detail about a person when something like this happens (a sad and tragic murder of innocent people). There is one question millions of Americans want to know and the media is intentionally ignoring this question.
I ask readers to be honest with themselves. When the murders began at the Navy Yard did you not start thinking of Ft. Hood? Of course we did. Did we not start asking ourselves if this is a terrorism event in the name of Islam? Of course we did. Has the media even mentioned what religion Aaron Alexis was? Of course not. Do they know? Of course they do.
From AP: U.S. law enforcement officials told The Associated Press that there was no known connection to terrorism and that investigators have found no manifesto or other writings suggesting a political or religious motive.
I am not suggesting Aaron Alexis was a Muslim, but as a concerned citizen and former law enforcement officer I want to know everything there is to know about these murders of inocent people. The motive behind any murder is very important and not only helps solve cases it can also be a tool to possibly prevent future violence.
How many of you have been searching Google for anything about Aaron Alexis's religion? Be honest. The media is doing Americans an injustice by not reporting the religion of Alexis. If he is Christian I want to know, if he is Jewish I want to know, if he is a Satanist I want to know, if he is a Muslim I want to know.
Right now there are liberal haters of Dave Gaubatz who would be saying based on my above remarks that I am saying Alexis was Muslim. Of course this is not what I am saying but the truth to liberals means absolutely nothing.
Why are media organizations not even mentioning if Alexis was or was not a Muslim? For the liberal media the answer is so obvious I want even begin to explain. I am more concerned with media outlets like Fox News. Do the journalists who make millions like Hannity and the others not think Americans want to know what religion Alexis was? Hannity himself wants to know and it was probaly one of his first questions he was asking when the murders began. Fox News doesn't want to being up anything about the shooters religion because they will get the little fingers of liberals pointed at them. They don't want to be accused of being insensitive to a religion.
I do not get paid millions for writing articles or speaking at events about terrorism issues, as a matter of fact I make absolutely nothing. But as a freelance journalist I feel it is important in today's times that Americans are told up front if there is even the slightest hint that an incident such as at the Navy Shipyard was in any way related to Islam. We are owed this and Americans should not feel guilty or ashamed of wanting to know if a murderer was Muslim or not.
Why do Americans have a right to know if a person involved in the large scale deaths such as Alexis was Muslim or not?
1. The answer is rather simple. All around the world there are murders of innocent people by people who are Muslim.
2. There are civil wars and fighting in numerous Islamic based countries.
3. Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups have said they would strike at the American people.
4. Al qaeda and others have been responsible for killing thousands of Americans in the last decade.
5. The Islamic ideology itselfs calls for hatred and violence against non Muslims.
I could go on and on, but the point is we have a right to know what religion a person is when we have attacks as in the Navy Yards. If this question is in the backs of people's minds then it should be answered and we have no reason to feel guilty.
I want to clarify that I do not know what religion Alexis was, but I will dig until I find out.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Islam Then and Now
People must begin to realize the Islamic ideology is based on hate, distrust, violence, and continual fighting. The Muslim people have been fighting non Muslims and amongst themselves for 1400 years, and it will never change. We need to stay out of the Middle East. Dave G.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Child Bride in Yemin Dies From Internal Bleeding on Her Wedding Night: She was 8 years old
The Prophet Mohammed married a 6 year old child (Aisha) and Muslim men around the world (to include America) simply follow his example (SAD): Dave Gaubatz
SANAA (Reuters) - An eight-year-old Yemeni girl died of internal bleeding on her wedding night after marrying a man five times her age, a social activist and two local residents said, in a case that has caused an outcry in the media and revived debate about child brides.
Arwa Othman, head of Yemen House of Folklore and a leading rights campaigner, said the girl, identified only as Rawan, was married to a 40-year-old man late last week in the town of Meedi in Hajjah province in northwestern Yemen.
"On the wedding night and after intercourse, she suffered from bleeding and uterine rupture which caused her death," Othman told Reuters. "They took her to a clinic but the medics couldn't save her life."
Othman said authorities had not taken any action against the girl's family or her husband.
A local security official in the provincial town of Haradh denied any such incident had taken place. He did not want to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the press.
But two Meedi residents contacted by Reuters confirmed the incident and said that local tribal chiefs had tried to cover up the incident when news first broke, warning a local journalist against covering the story.
Many poor families in Yemen marry off young daughters to save on the costs of bringing up a child and earn extra money from the dowry given to the girl.
A U.N. report released in January revealed the extent of the country's poverty, saying that 10.5 million of Yemen's 24 million people lacked sufficient food supplies, and 13 million had no access to safe water and basic sanitation.
Human Rights Watch urged Yemen's government in December 2011 to ban marriages of girls under the age of 18, warning it deprived child brides of education and harmed their health.
Quoting United Nations and government data, HRW said nearly 14 percent of Yemeni girls were married before the age of 15 and 52 percent before the age of 18. The group said many Yemeni child brides-to-be are kept from school when they reach puberty.
Discussions on the issue were shelved by political turmoil following protests against President Ali Abdullah Saleh in 2011 that led to his ouster.
(Reporting by Mohammed Ghobari; Writing by Mahmoud Habboush; editing by Mike Collett-White)
. . .
View Comments
11 Minute Audio Lecture by Dave Gaubatz
This is a 11 minute audio presentation by Dave Gaubatz recorded on 10 Sept 2013. It is a powerful presentation pertaining to the role of women and young girls in Islam. It is a true portrayal using evidence from Islamic books and Islamic scholars. There is no sugar-coating. Dave will be developing at least one audio presentation per week.
http://archive.org/details/TheRoleOfWomenGirlsInIslam Paste this into your browser
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Is Obama a Muslim?
Is Obama a Muslim?
This is the one question I get asked more than any other. The best answer I can give is I do not know if he is now, but he was born a Muslim in accordance with Sharia law, because his father was a Muslim. He attended Islamic schools. did he later leave Islam? If so he is an Apostate of Islam.
The real question people should be asking is, "Are his policies in line with Sharia law or the U.S. Constitution"? Based on what I have seen in the last five years, Obama is more in line with how an Islamic based country would rule their people. Obama follows Sharia law more so than the U.S. Constitution.
I have little hope that Obama will be impeached because there is no one on the left or right who will push the issue. This means another 3 long years of being governed by a Sharia law President. Dave Gaubatz
Why Would Iranian Leader's Threaten to Have One of Obama's Daughters Raped If He Strikes Syria?
By: Dave Gaubatz
6 Sep 2013
This is a question no one in the media from the left to the right will address fully. Iranian leaders have vowed to have one of Obama's daughters raped if he follows through with a strike on Syria.
The reason Iranian leaders have said they will rape one of Obama's daughters and few Islamic leaders worldwide are standing up to say this is wrong is because this is 'Pure Islam'.
Islamic scholars have been saying from 1400 years ago to the present day that when Muslims are engaged in physical Jihad (Jihad Qital) that the victors can use the female captives of their enemies as they choose. They can take them as slaves and rape them.
This is an article from the Daily Caller:
"As Congress debates whether to support President Obama's call for a limited strike against Syria for the alleged use of chemical weapons, Iran is vowing to back Bashar al-Assad's regime to the hilt and threatening to unleash terrorism should the U.S. strike.
Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's Quds Forces, Wednesday told the Assembly of Experts - the body that chooses the supreme leader - that "[w]e will support Syria to the end."
And in an unprecedented statement, a former Iranian official has warned of mass abductions and brutal killings of American citizens around the world and the rape and killing of one of Obama's daughters should the United States attack Syria".
Over a period of 3 plus decades I have been studying Islam and more specifically I have focused on understanding why Muslims think and act. Why do they speak of commiting barbaric acts on innocent children, such as Obama's daughters?
The answer is very simple. In mosques and Islamic Centers around the world Muslims are brainwashed into hating with all of their heart their enemies. Jews and Christians are branded in Islam as their number one enemy, and anyone who supports either are the enemy of Islam.
I have been to hundreds of mosques worldwide and there are materials provided to Muslims to hate and have the desire for Jihad in their lives. There are numerous Islamic materials justifying the rape and murder of innocent people. There are numerous materials advocating child marriages in Islam.
Now to address in more detail the Iranian leader calling for the rape of one of Obama's daughters. One must remember that the supreme leader and founder of Islam was Prophet Muhammed.
Muhammed is the example for all Muslims on how they should think and act. In their eyes Muhammed did no wrong. All Islamic material informs Muslims to go about their daily lives as Muhammed did.
Muhammed was just as evil as Hitler, but few will say this as I do. Muhammed married a six year old innocent child (Aisha) and raped her for years.
Muhammed carried out more than 78 historic Jihad expeditions. He informed his Muslim soldiers that the women and children were those as bounty for defeating the enemy. They could take the women and children as slaves and this meant they could beat them and rape them at their will.
This subject isn't fun to deal with. I have always said 'all children' are innocent and they must be protected. Islam has never been peaceful and it is time for people to understand that Islam was not meant to be peaceful. Islam was built on rape, slavery, hate, and Jihad. Islam will not change.
Often I am criticized because I lump the everyday Muslims in with the known violent Islamic leaders. My background is law enforcement. If four people drive up to a bank and three go inside to rob and one of them kills a bank teller, under the law all four are guilty of murder.
In Islam if a person (Muslim) knows that the Islamic ideology teaches hate, violence, and includes raping innocent children, and they do nothing, then they are just as guilty. The Muslim community itself should be standing up and screaming at the top of their voices that the Iranian leader is wrong for calling for the rape of one of Obama's daughters.
The 'Million Muslim March' is coming to DC on 9-11. Their focus should be denouncing any violence toward anyone. They should be standing up in the millions around the world saying they will no longer Islamic leaders to call for hate and violence.
My friends, Muslims will not do this. They would all become Apostates of Islam if they denounced the teachings of Prophet Muhammed. Hate, murder, and rape are all aspects of the Islamic ideology.
I have said many times that the only way to defeat Islamic leaders calling for Jihad, is to destroy the Islamic ideology itself. going to war in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria, will accomplish nothing. Islamic leaders know this. They want to drag America into wars. Islamic leaders know they can stand up to any military on the battlefield, because they do not use common military strategies. They use the murder and rape of innocent people. They behead their enemies and praise their Allah at the same time.
What Islamic leaders fear is that someday people will realize there is only one way to beat them. That is to strike at the Islamic ideology and not Islamic countries.
50 years from now people around the world should cringe when they hear any words about Islam, Muhammed, or the Quran. People today cringe when Hitler and Mein Kampf (Hitler's hate book) are mentioned. This is correct and as cruel as some may think, in order to save Christians and Jews from further onlslaught and rape, we must condemn Islam at it's very roots.
It is no secret I care little for Obama as President, but I would fight on his side any day when it comes to protecting his innocent children.
Friday, September 6, 2013
This Jihad manual is in numerous mosques across America. It clarifies exactly what the term 'Jihad' means in Islam and it is not the 'Talking Points' definition used by CAIR and others. Jihad means physical fighting (Jihad Qital) against their enemies. There is such a thing as an internal struggle, but it all comes down to killing their enemies. Order for $10.00 (Includes shipping) Dave Gaubatz
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
There R No Radicals or Moderates in Islam
There are three types of people involved in Islam. 1. Practicing Muslims 2. Non Practicing people who say they are Muslim 3. People like myself who are aware of the dangers of Islam and doing my utmost to educate people. The Non practicing Muslims are simply Apostates of Islam. Many people refer to them as the 'Moderates'. I have written about this before, but it is important to continue emphasizing this point. There is no such thing in Islam as a moderate or radical. You either choose to practice Islam or you don't. You can't be an in betweener in Islam. Islam itself does not allow this. Dave Gaubatz
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Long Term Effects of Cocaine: Our President Admitted Using
"The Washington Post raises the pre-emptive question of the senator's direct confession (in his intimate memoir, "Dreams of My Father") that he used cocaine and marijuana in high school and college".
The above is just one of many confirmations pertaining to Obama using illegal narcotics (cocaine and marijuana). Obama has never denied his use of cocaine. The U.S. government has advised there are long term effects from having used cocaine. One of the primary consequences can be Paranoia.
Paranoia:
Irrational suspicions and delusions of persecution are a side effect of cocaine use that negatively affect the human brain. This paranoia can eventually lead to psychosis, at which point the user breaks with reality and experiences hallucinations–hearing or seeing things in the absence of stimulus.
Americans wanting to join the U.S. military cannot get a waiver if they have ever used cocaine. This being said we have a Commander in Chief who has admitted using cocaine, and virtually all medical doctors will tell you that being paranoid is a long term effect of cocaine use. The U.S. govt. acknowledges this and therefor no person can enter the U.S. military if they have EVER used cocaine.
While I was a U.S. Federal Agent with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI)we conducted numerous investigations on troops who used cocaine before they entered the USAF and ones who used after entering the USAF. In both cases they were either sent to prison or received bad conduct discharges. They were not allowed to even be a 'cook' in the military because everyone knew a cocaine user could have relapses and could react to situations irrationally and with paranoia. The answer was very simple. No one can be in the military if they ever used cocaine.
Why then do we allow people to become the President of the U.S., and this means they are the Commander in Chief over all of our military. The President has the right to use our nuclear weapons, and even to call for military strikes against foreign governments, such as Syria!
Does it make you feel safe knowing our Commander in Chief can be irrational and paranoid because of his cociane use? He has the authority to send our young men and women into combat and his reasoning may be due to his cocaine usage.
It is time Obama was impeached. There are a host of other reasons besides his cocaine use, but this is the most urgent reason. If it is not true that cocaine has long term effects on the brain, then we should allow citizens to serve in the military if they have used coaine prior to enlistment. We should apologize to the thousands who have been court-martialled and sent to prison or given a bad conduct discharge. I do not personally want this. I simply want the President of the United States to be one who has his wits about him when he decides to send our young men and women into war and put our country at risk.
Qualifications for the Office of President
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 – ratified February 27, 1951
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Maybe we should add: No person shall be elected to the office of the President if they have ever used any illegal narcotic, to include marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and/or heroin.
The above is just one of many confirmations pertaining to Obama using illegal narcotics (cocaine and marijuana). Obama has never denied his use of cocaine. The U.S. government has advised there are long term effects from having used cocaine. One of the primary consequences can be Paranoia.
Paranoia:
Irrational suspicions and delusions of persecution are a side effect of cocaine use that negatively affect the human brain. This paranoia can eventually lead to psychosis, at which point the user breaks with reality and experiences hallucinations–hearing or seeing things in the absence of stimulus.
Americans wanting to join the U.S. military cannot get a waiver if they have ever used cocaine. This being said we have a Commander in Chief who has admitted using cocaine, and virtually all medical doctors will tell you that being paranoid is a long term effect of cocaine use. The U.S. govt. acknowledges this and therefor no person can enter the U.S. military if they have EVER used cocaine.
While I was a U.S. Federal Agent with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI)we conducted numerous investigations on troops who used cocaine before they entered the USAF and ones who used after entering the USAF. In both cases they were either sent to prison or received bad conduct discharges. They were not allowed to even be a 'cook' in the military because everyone knew a cocaine user could have relapses and could react to situations irrationally and with paranoia. The answer was very simple. No one can be in the military if they ever used cocaine.
Why then do we allow people to become the President of the U.S., and this means they are the Commander in Chief over all of our military. The President has the right to use our nuclear weapons, and even to call for military strikes against foreign governments, such as Syria!
Does it make you feel safe knowing our Commander in Chief can be irrational and paranoid because of his cociane use? He has the authority to send our young men and women into combat and his reasoning may be due to his cocaine usage.
It is time Obama was impeached. There are a host of other reasons besides his cocaine use, but this is the most urgent reason. If it is not true that cocaine has long term effects on the brain, then we should allow citizens to serve in the military if they have used coaine prior to enlistment. We should apologize to the thousands who have been court-martialled and sent to prison or given a bad conduct discharge. I do not personally want this. I simply want the President of the United States to be one who has his wits about him when he decides to send our young men and women into war and put our country at risk.
Qualifications for the Office of President
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 – ratified February 27, 1951
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Maybe we should add: No person shall be elected to the office of the President if they have ever used any illegal narcotic, to include marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and/or heroin.
Monday, September 2, 2013
Dave Gaubatz Newsletter
It is important that Americans get involved and are truly concerned about the Islamic ideology/Sharia law being America's #1 National Security concern. It is not Syria, Egypt, Iraq, or Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, it is the Islamic ideology itself. If you do not receive my Newsletter please send me a message and I will add you to the list. I have approx. 11,000 people who get my Newsletter. They in turn send to thousands more. Get involved. Help with sending the Newsletters to your friends, family and co-workers. Thanks, Dave Gaubatz
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Obama: World's Weakest Leader
There is really no reason for anyone to try and debate my statement about Obama being the 'World's Worst Leader'. He has not only failed America, but he has failed the world. No current government respects Obama. They know he can't be trusted and they have no faith in his leadership. There is one good thing coming from this. He only has 1200 more days to destroy our country and to make us a laughing stock in all parts of the world. Obama will go down in history as the worst of the worst. It should be a lesson to all American voters. Do not vote for someone simply because they are African American and a Community Organizer. We don't need community Organizers. This is a low level job in a city or county type environment. Our future leaders must have experience in understanding America and the world. Not just Chicago. Dave G.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)